Tax & Regulatory ComplianceExplainer4 min readUpdated September 2026

Section 174 for Software Startups: Amortization and the 2025 Change

Since a 2025 law added Section 174A, software startups can generally deduct domestic research and development costs immediately for tax years beginning after 2024, while foreign research is still amortized over fifteen years. The earlier rule forced five-year amortization, which created taxable income despite losses. Transition rules depend on your situation.

This guide explains what the amortization rule did, why it hurt cash, what the 2025 change does and what to model now. Tax rules move and transition elections are detailed, so confirm every step with your CPA.

Vendors Covered in this Article

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

What did Section 174 change for software companies?

Before the change, companies could deduct engineering payroll and related research costs in the year they paid them. Legislation passed in 2017 changed that for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021. Costs treated as specified research or experimental expenditures had to be capitalized and amortized, and the statute treats software development costs as falling into that category.

The amortization periods were five years for research performed in the United States and fifteen years for research performed abroad. Amortization begins at the midpoint of the tax year, so the first year of a five-year schedule allows only one-tenth of the total. Abandoning a project did not accelerate the remaining deduction.

The rule reached beyond developers' salaries. Related overhead, some software and cloud costs used in development, and payments to contractors could all fall within it, which is why a review of your cost categories is worthwhile, not just a look at the payroll line.

How did taxable income end up above cash profit?

Here is a worked case. Say a software company has $3,000,000 of revenue and $3,000,000 of expenses, so it breaks even in cash. Suppose $2,000,000 of that spending is engineering cost subject to five-year amortization and $1,000,000 is other operating cost.

If you deduct only one-tenth of the $2,000,000 in year one, that is $200,000. Total deductions then come to $1,200,000 against $3,000,000 of revenue, which leaves $1,800,000 of taxable income in this example. At a 21% federal corporate rate, the tax bill would be about $378,000 for a company that had no cash profit.

The median private B2B SaaS company spends 22 percent of ARR on R&D1, so engineering cost is a large share of the budget for many software businesses, and the rule reached them hard. The remaining amortization deductions arrive in later years, so the burden was a timing cost, but a painful one when cash was tight.

What did the 2025 law change?

Legislation enacted in 2025 added a new Section 174A. In broad terms, it lets companies deduct domestic research and experimental expenditures currently, for tax years beginning after 2024. Research performed outside the United States continues to be amortized over fifteen years.

Transition rules address costs that were capitalized in earlier years. Taxpayers can generally choose to deduct the remaining unamortized domestic amounts from the 2022 through 2024 period over a short window beginning in 2025, and smaller businesses have an option to apply the new treatment back to 2022 by amending returns. Eligibility, elections and deadlines differ by company size and situation, and some states did not follow the federal change.

Ask your CPA which of these applies. The choice can create a refund, a lower current-year bill or an amended-return workload, and it interacts with the R&D credit covered in R&D tax credit eligibility for software startups.

How to model the cash impact and get your filings right

Work through these steps with your CPA:

  1. Confirm what your last three returns did: which costs were capitalized, over what schedule and in which years.
  2. Separate domestic from foreign development. Offshore contractors and foreign employees are on the longer schedule.
  3. Choose transition elections for prior-year capitalized costs, and estimate the cash effect of each option.
  4. Recompute estimated tax payments for the current year under the current rule.
  5. Model the tax effect in your cash forecast for the next four quarters, including any refunds and the timing of amended returns.
  6. Track the R&D credit calculation alongside, because the credit and the deduction interact.

A driver-based cash forecast makes the difference visible to investors, and a ledger that tracks costs by project simplifies the tax schedule. See the accounting system comparison if your current system cannot hold a separate tax basis, and the planning software comparison for forecasting tools.

What else should you check in your own filings?

A change like this is a good moment to review neighboring issues:

  • Amortization schedule detail: if you still carry capitalized costs, see Section 174 R&D amortization and startup tax bills for more on how those schedules are handled.
  • Contractors and offshore work: confirm where each piece of research was performed, since domestic and foreign work follow different schedules.
  • Cost categories: check which overhead, cloud and software costs were swept into the capitalized amount, so the tax schedule matches your ledger.
  • State conformity: confirm whether each state where you file follows the federal treatment.

The most reliable protection is to keep project-level records of development costs, so any change in the rules can be applied without rebuilding history. If a lender or investor asks about your tax position, be ready to explain the difference between the book expense and the tax deduction.

Executive Capability Standard

What Good Looks Like

You know which development costs you capitalized in each year, which schedule applies, and how much cash tax the current treatment produces.

Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)

1. Learn:Learn the old and new treatments and which of your costs are domestic or foreign.
2. Do Manually:Build a schedule of capitalized costs by year and project, and compare election options in a spreadsheet.
3. Delegate:Have your CPA choose transition elections, file amended returns if useful and recompute estimated payments.
4. Automate:Tag development costs by project and location in your ledger so schedules update as you close each month.
5. Buy:Use an accounting or planning system that can hold tax-basis schedules and feed the tax effect into your cash forecast.

How to Get Started

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

NetSuite

Fits when you need capitalized development costs tracked by project in a larger ledger, so confirm tax-basis reporting in a demo.

Visit NetSuite→
Jirav

Fits when you want the tax effect of research costs built into a rolling cash and runway forecast.

Visit Jirav→

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Section 174 and why did it matter for startups?

It governs how research and software development costs are deducted. For tax years beginning after 2021, those costs had to be amortized over five years domestically or fifteen years abroad, which created taxable income for companies with little or no cash profit.

Does the 2025 law repeal the Section 174 amortization rule?

It restored current deduction for domestic research expenditures for tax years beginning after 2024 under a new Section 174A, while foreign research is still amortized over fifteen years. Transition rules apply to earlier years, so confirm elections with your CPA.

Is software development treated as research under Section 174?

Yes. The statute treats amounts paid in connection with developing software as research or experimental expenditures. That is why engineering payroll and related costs were caught by the amortization rule.

Can you recover taxes paid under the old Section 174 rule?

Possibly. Transition provisions let some taxpayers accelerate remaining deductions, and smaller businesses may be able to apply the new treatment to earlier years through amended returns. Eligibility depends on company size and facts, so ask your CPA.

Sources

Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.

  1. R&D/engineering spend as % of ARR (median, private B2B SaaS). SaaS Capital 2026 Spending Benchmarks for Private B2B SaaS Companies (15th annual survey, 1,000+ companies), 2026.

Related Guides