FloQast vs. AuditBoard for Federal and Defense Contractors
A federal contractor's close has to satisfy an internal reviewer and, eventually, a government auditor asking a very specific question: can you prove, with a documented paper trail, that every dollar in your indirect cost pools was allocated correctly and that every hour on a timesheet was actually approved by someone with the authority to approve it. That standard is higher than almost any commercial business ever has to meet.
For a government contractor, FloQast vs AuditBoard is less a choice between two similar tools and more a question of which layer needs the most work right now: the mechanical rate reconciliation, or the documented control evidence a government audit specifically expects to see.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Indirect rate pools have to reconcile to the general ledger every period
Overhead, fringe, and G&A pools each accumulate specific cost categories that then allocate to contracts based on a defined base, and a pool that isn't reconciled to the general ledger monthly means the provisional billing rates charged to the government all period are working off numbers that might not hold up once the actual rate is calculated. Reconcile each pool separately, tie it to the ledger every month, and compare the provisional rate against the trending actual rate so a significant variance gets caught and communicated before the annual incurred cost submission, not discovered during it.
Timekeeping controls are a compliance requirement, not just good practice
Labor charged to a specific contract has to be supported by a timesheet the employee entered and approved themselves, on the day the work was performed, with any correction documented and separately approved, a standard significantly stricter than most commercial timekeeping systems enforce by default. A reconciliation that ties labor cost in the ledger back to approved timesheets monthly catches a system or process gap before it becomes a finding in a government audit.
Cost accounting standards compliance depends on consistency, not correctness alone
Cost Accounting Standards, where they apply, care as much about whether your company applies its stated cost accounting practices consistently period over period as whether any single period's numbers are technically correct, so a change in how a cost is classified or allocated needs to be documented and, in some cases, formally disclosed, not made quietly. Confirm CAS applicability and disclosure requirements for your specific contracts with a government contracts specialist, since the rules depend on contract type and dollar thresholds that change.
How FloQast handles pool and timekeeping reconciliations
Indirect rate pool reconciliations, labor-to-timesheet tie-outs, and monthly variance tracking against provisional billing rates are recurring, checklist-driven work that fits FloQast's model well: a named preparer and reviewer per reconciliation, with a variance that stays open until explained, instead of a controller reassembling the rate picture from scratch before every incurred cost submission.
Where AuditBoard becomes the more central tool
A government contractor's compliance expectations go beyond reconciled numbers into documented, testable controls almost by default, given how DCAA-style audits and incurred cost reviews actually work, which makes AuditBoard's controls library relevant earlier here than in most other industries: who reviewed each pool allocation, who approved each timesheet correction, and on what cadence, held as evidence a government auditor can sample directly.
Deciding where the real gap is
- If indirect rate pool and timekeeping reconciliations are the recurring mess at close, start with FloQast to get the mechanics right first.
- If your business has already been through, or is preparing for, a DCAA audit or incurred cost review, AuditBoard's formal controls library is likely worth building now rather than after the first finding.
- If CAS applicability to your specific contracts hasn't been confirmed with a specialist, resolve that question first, since it determines requirements no reconciliation tool can substitute for.
A worked example: one pool's provisional versus actual rate
Say your overhead pool's provisional billing rate is set at the start of the year, and by the third quarter, reconciled pool costs against the ledger show the actual rate trending meaningfully higher than what's being billed to the government on active contracts. Left uncorrected until the annual incurred cost submission, that gap means the government has been underbilled all year, and true-up billing months after the fact tends to draw more scrutiny than a rate adjustment communicated proactively once the trend became clear. Reconciling the pool monthly and comparing it against the provisional rate is what surfaces that gap in September instead of the following spring.
Subcontractor cost flow-down needs its own documented check
Costs from a subcontractor performing work under your prime contract have to flow through your own indirect rate pools correctly, and a subcontractor invoice applied to the wrong cost category, direct labor treated as an indirect cost, for example, distorts both your rate calculation and the specific contract's cost reporting to the government. Reconcile subcontractor costs against their contractual classification before they hit the pools, since correcting a misclassification after several months of incurred cost reporting is considerably harder than catching it at the point the invoice is first coded.
What Good Looks Like
A contractor at this stage reconciles every indirect rate pool to the general ledger monthly, ties labor cost to approved timesheets, and tracks provisional rates against the trending actual rate ahead of the annual incurred cost submission.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Outside consultants and specialized subcontractors paid on a 1099 basis need current filing and TIN matching, which Tax1099 keeps organized for a compliance review.
Vendor and subcontractor payments benefit from BILL's dual-approval routing, giving a government audit a clean segregation-of-duties trail to review.
Program staff covering small travel or supply purchases is where receipt documentation usually slips, and Ramp's automated capture keeps that record intact for review.
Frequently Asked Questions
How often should indirect rate pools be reconciled?
Monthly, tied directly to the general ledger, with the resulting actual rate trend compared against your provisional billing rate. Waiting until the annual incurred cost submission to reconcile pools for the first time means any error compounds across twelve months before anyone catches it.
Do smaller government contractors need AuditBoard right away?
It depends on the size and type of your contracts, and whether a DCAA audit or incurred cost review is already on the horizon; confirm the specific requirements with a government contracts advisor. Many smaller contractors start with FloQast to get pool and timekeeping reconciliations solid, then add AuditBoard's controls library as contract size and audit exposure grow.
What's the most common timekeeping compliance gap?
A correction made to a timesheet after the fact without a separate, documented approval, which is exactly the kind of gap a government audit looks for specifically. Reconciling labor cost in the ledger against approved timesheets monthly, rather than only when a contract requires a formal review, catches this before it becomes a finding.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
DCAA Compliance and the Close: FloQast, BlackLine or Both
The decision criteria a federal or defense contractor should use for its close under DCAA requirements, comparing FloQast and BlackLine directly.
Sales Tax Exemptions on Federal and Defense Contracts
Government exemption certificates can wipe out sales tax on federal contract purchases, but only with the right paperwork. A runbook for GovCon compliance.
BILL vs Tipalti for Federal and Defense Contractors
A DCAA-minded runbook for BILL versus Tipalti at a federal or defense contractor, from cost-category tagging to flow-down payment terms.
Ramp or Brex for a Federal and Defense Contractor
Unallowable costs have to be segregated before the incurred cost submission, not during an audit. Ramp, Brex and Navan against DCAA scrutiny.
409A Valuation for a Cleared Federal Contractor
Ownership changes at a cleared contractor can reach a facility clearance, and stock comp has to be handled inside your indirect rate structure. Here's how.
Airbase vs Procurify for Federal and Defense Contractors
A compliance-first decision guide to Airbase versus Procurify for federal and defense contractors, built around DCAA allowability and cost element tagging.