Financial Audit Management & Pre-IPO Compliance3 min readUpdated September 2026

FloQast vs. AuditBoard for Dental Support Organizations

A dental support organization closing ten or fifteen locations isn't closing ten or fifteen small businesses, it's closing one set of books with location-level detail that has to roll up correctly. Insurance claims age differently by payer, management fees charged to each practice have to eliminate on consolidation, and doctor compensation true-ups depend on production numbers that come from a practice management system the accounting team doesn't directly control.

For a DSO, FloQast vs AuditBoard usually comes down to whether the location-by-location reconciliation is what's slow, or whether the DSO's owners, lenders, or a future acquirer want documented proof the review actually happened at each site.

Vendors Covered in this Article

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

Insurance receivables age on a payer's schedule, not yours

Dental insurance claims can sit unpaid for 30, 60, or 90 days depending on the payer, and a downcoded or partially denied claim often needs a resubmission before it's fully resolved. An aging report at the DSO level that doesn't break out by payer and by location hides which specific relationships are actually the problem. Reconcile claims aging by location and payer monthly, and flag any bucket where the aging is trending worse than the prior period.

Management fee eliminations have to survive consolidation

A management fee charged from the DSO's management company to each practice entity needs to eliminate cleanly when the group's financials consolidate, and a fee schedule that changes location by location, or an entity structure with a dental service organization model layered on top, makes that elimination easy to get wrong. Reconcile the management fee intercompany balance every close, not just at year end, so a mismatch shows up while it's one month's worth of noise instead of a full year's.

Doctor compensation true-ups depend on data outside the ledger

Production-based or collections-based doctor compensation typically runs on a formula tied to numbers that live in the practice management system, not the general ledger, and a true-up done quarterly or annually means a doctor's pay can swing significantly when the correction finally lands. Reconciling the compensation accrual against actual production monthly, even on a smaller scale than the full formal true-up, keeps that swing from becoming a surprise for the doctor or the business.

What FloQast is built to carry across locations

Recurring reconciliations for claims aging, management fee eliminations, and compensation accruals, repeated the same way at every location, is exactly what FloQast's checklist model handles well: the same reconciliation structure rolls forward location by location, with a reviewer who can see at a glance which sites closed clean and which are still open.

Where AuditBoard's controls library becomes relevant

As a DSO grows past a handful of locations, brings on outside capital, or starts preparing for a sale, owners and lenders increasingly want documented evidence that reviews actually happened at the location level, not just that the consolidated numbers tie out. AuditBoard's controls library holds that evidence: who reviewed each location's close, on what cadence, and whether segregation of duties held between whoever bills insurance and whoever posts the resulting cash.

Matching the tool to the location's actual problem

  • If claims aging and management fee reconciliations are the recurring mess every close, start with FloQast.
  • If a lender, private equity partner, or acquirer's diligence team has started asking for documented location-level review evidence, bring in AuditBoard.
  • If doctor compensation true-ups are the source of the most disputes, fix that reconciliation cadence directly; the platform matters less than catching the gap monthly instead of annually. MeetMyCFO's AI CFO, Frank, can flag which location's claims aging has moved the wrong direction before the group-level close hides it inside an average.

Refunds and credit balances need their own review

A patient credit balance from an overpayment or an insurance overpayment that never gets refunded sits as a liability that grows quietly across dozens of locations if nobody reviews it on a schedule. Reconcile credit balances by location monthly, and set a policy for how long a credit sits before it's either refunded or escheated under your state's unclaimed property rules, which you should confirm with counsel since those rules vary by state. A DSO that never reviews this account tends to discover a much larger balance than expected the first time an outside party asks about it.

A worked example: one location's month end

Say a single location's claims aging shows a growing balance with one specific payer, its management fee elimination is off by a small amount from the prior month, and its doctor compensation accrual hasn't been trued up in two quarters. Reconciled separately, each of those three items points to a specific, fixable cause: a payer relationship worth escalating, a fee schedule change that wasn't reflected in the intercompany entry, and a compensation formula overdue for its update. Combined into one location-level variance with no breakdown, the same three issues just look like the location is having a bad month, which is a much harder thing for a group controller to act on.

Executive Capability Standard

What Good Looks Like

A DSO at this stage reconciles insurance claims aging, management fee eliminations, and compensation accruals by location every month, with a named reviewer at each site and a documented rollup to the consolidated close.

Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)

1. Learn:Pull claims aging by location and payer for the last close and identify which specific combinations are driving the overall balance.
2. Do Manually:Build a standardized monthly reconciliation template used identically across every location, with a required sign-off before consolidation.
3. Delegate:Assign one person to own the management fee elimination and compensation accrual reconciliations, separate from location-level billing staff.
4. Automate:Connect FloQast or AuditBoard to your practice management systems across locations so claims and production data reconcile without manual exports.
5. Buy:Add a formal controls platform once a lender, investor, or acquirer's diligence team requires documented location-level review evidence.

How to Get Started

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should insurance claims aging be reviewed at the location level?

Monthly, broken out by payer and location. A group-level aging report that blends every site together can look acceptable on average while one or two locations are quietly falling behind with a specific payer, and that pattern only becomes visible once it's broken apart.

Do smaller dental groups need AuditBoard?

Not necessarily. If no lender, investor, or acquirer is asking for documented review evidence beyond the consolidated numbers, FloQast's reconciliation checklist usually covers what a smaller group needs across its locations. Revisit that once outside capital or a sale process enters the picture.

What causes the biggest doctor compensation disputes?

A true-up done only quarterly or annually, so a formula error or a production data mismatch compounds for months before anyone catches it. Reconciling the compensation accrual against production monthly, even informally, surfaces a discrepancy while it's small enough to explain calmly.

About the numbers

This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.

Related Guides